ERISA-Qualified Government Health Plans Under Attack by Plaintiff’s Bar

In recent years, we have seen challenges to the exemption for church-sponsored pension plans contained in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). A U.S. Supreme Court decision in 2017 (Advocate Health Care Network et al. v. Stapleton et al.) seemed to settle the argument that plans offered by church-affiliated hospitals still qualified for the exemption. However, it now appears that ERISA-qualified government health plans may be under attack.

 

Shore v. The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority

On November 19, 2018, a group of current and former employees filed a lawsuit against The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority (the “Hospital”). The hospital, doing business as Atrium Health (“Atrium”), managed several employee benefit plans for workers at the Hospital under the ERISA “governmental entity” exemption. The lawsuit alleges that Atrium does not satisfy the requirements for that exemption.

Plaintiffs also allege that Atrium, unfettered by the need to comply with ERISA:

  • ignored ERISA minimum funding requirements,
  • disregarded disclosure requirements, and
  • engaged in ERISA-prohibited financial transactions with related parties that may have led to higher healthcare costs for participants.

Bad behavior aside, the central question is whether Atrium qualifies as a government plan under ERISA.

Government Health Plans Are Different

ERISA does not treat all employee benefit plans the same. Specifically, plans sponsored by governmental agencies and religious institutions are exempt from many ERISA requirements.

Plaintiffs in Shore allege that Atrium fails the test for several reasons, including:

  • “Atrium’s operations are not controlled or overseen by a governmental body;
  • Its employees are not treated as government employees;
  • It does not receive government funding (aside from funding typically provided to hospitals);
  • It does not have taxing authority to fund its operations or raise revenue to fund its plans; and
  • The U.S. government and the State of North Carolina are currently suing it.”

What Does This Mean for ERISA-Qualified Government Health Plans Going Forward?

As the Shore v. The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority case grinds through the court system, it remains to be seen whether ERISA exemptions will be tightened in coming  years. It’s possible that other members of the plaintiff’s bar may see merit in attacking ERISA-qualified government health plans, leading to an increased number of court challenges.

At Hall Benefits Law, we work closely with clients like you to make sure your employee benefit plans meet your goals. Please call 678-439-6236 to discuss your concerns with an experienced attorney. Our website contains more information about our firm, a Contact Form, and free resources for your review. From our home office in Georgia, we assist clients throughout the United States, from New York to New Mexico to California.

The following two tabs change content below.

Hall Benefits Law, LLC

HBL offers employers comprehensive legal guidance on benefits in mergers and acquisitions, Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs), executive compensation, health and welfare benefits, healthcare reform, and retirement plans. We counsel a wide spectrum of clients including small, mid-sized, and large companies, 401(k) investment advisors, health insurance brokers, accountants, attorneys, and HR consultants, just to name a few. HBL is passionate about advising clients, and we are dedicated to our mission: to provide comprehensive, personalized, and practical ERISA and benefits legal solutions that exceed client expectations.

Latest posts by Hall Benefits Law, LLC (see all)

%d bloggers like this: