The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has issued a proposed rule that would include subjecting more investment advisors to ERISA’s fiduciary rule, including its strict conflict of interest provisions. The proposed rule comes five years after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit struck down the DOL’s 2018 final rule defining who qualifies as an ERISA fiduciary.
According to the DOL, the purpose of the proposed rule is to ensure that investment professionals receive fair remuneration for their advice and properly place their clients before their commissions. The White House also commented on the rule, citing the need to protect individuals saving for retirement, crack down on “junk fees” in retirement plans, and prohibit investment advisors from offering biased advice due to conflicts of interest.
Among the major changes in the voluminous proposed rule are changes to the definition of an investment advice fiduciary under ERISA. This definition change is designed to encompass investment advice for individuals rolling over funds from workplace retirement plans to individual retirement accounts (IRAs).
The DOL also included three sets of amendments to the so-called “prohibited transaction exemptions” under ERISA in its proposed rule. Financial professionals use these exemptions to manage conflicts of interest when advising about retirement plan investments in exchange for a fee. The proposed changes impact the following exemptions:
- PTE 2020-02, an exemption finalized during the Trump administration that the financial industry widely relies upon in recommending rollovers to clients;
- PTE 84-24, an exemption for use by insurance agents; and
- PTEs 75-1, 77-4, 80-83, 83-1, and 86-128, several other ERISA-prohibited transaction exemptions that financial professionals use in different investment advice situations.